The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) is a psychological theory used to explain how persuasion works.
This model suggests that people process persuasive messages differently based on their personal qualities and circumstances, and understanding this variation in response to marketing stimuli is key to the creation of effective and efficient marketing strategies.
Contents
Understanding Elaboration Likelihood Model
Formally introduced by Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo in the 1980s, the Elaboration Likelihood Model examines how consumers process and respond to persuasive messages. In simpler terms, it helps us understand how individuals make decisions when confronted with promotional or sales messages.
The ELM proposes two distinct routes to persuasion: the central route and the peripheral route.
- Central Route: This is engaged when a person has the motivation and ability to think thoroughly about a message. Here, consumers scrutinize data closely – they ponder facts, statistics, logical arguments, and the quality of the message. Essentially, consumers influenced via this route are more likely to sustain the behavioral change over the long term.
- Peripheral Route: Unlike the central route, this targets consumers who aren’t particularly interested in the message’s content. Instead, they rely on superficial cues or aspects of the message – such as celebrity endorsements, attractive visuals, or catchy jingles. While this might stimulate an immediate reaction, the impact often doesn’t endure as long compared to the central route.
Role of ELM in Marketing Strategy
ELM is more than just a theory – it’s a potent marketing tool. Let’s understand how:
- Audience Segmentation: By identifying whether your audience is more likely to take a central or peripheral route, you can segment them better and tailor your messages accordingly.
- Message Designing: The ELM informs the content and design of your messages. For a central route audience, focus on strong facts and logical arguments. For a peripheral route audience, catchy visuals or celebrity endorsements might be the way to go.
- Long-Term Consumer Behavior: Understanding ELM can help predict how long the influence of a campaign might last. A consumer persuaded through the central route is likely to remain loyal longer.
Let’s imagine you’re a brand selling a high-tech gadget. Here’s how ELM would influence your marketing strategy:
- If your target audience is tech-savvy consumers, you’d utilize the central route. Your advertising would focus on the gadget’s innovative features, the processing speed, the state-of-the-art technology used, etc.
- Conversely, if you’re targeting a less tech-savvy audience, then you’d opt for the peripheral route. In this case, your advertisements might feature a popular celebrity praising the product or beautiful graphics showcasing the gadget’s sleek design.
Remember, no one route is inherently “better” than the other. It’s about identifying which is more appropriate for your specific audience and marketing objectives. By effectively using the ELM, you can craft a powerful marketing strategy that leaves a lasting impact on your desired audience.
Photo by nathan030997 on Unsplash
Two Routes to Persuasion
Central Route to Persuasion: An Expanded View
Recall that under ELM, the central route to persuasion refers to a process where consumers are influenced by the strength and quality of an argument. They tend to process this information thoroughly and form a significant cognitive response.
To illustrate this, think about purchasing a car. You aren’t going to make a substantial investment based on fancy car commercials or great sales pitches, are you? No, you’ll look at the mileage, safety features, resale value, and more.
These data points represent the ‘central cues’ that form the basis for your decision, a direct result of your engagement with the central route to persuasion.
Delving Deeper into the Peripheral Route to Persuasion
Contrary to the central route, the peripheral route bypasses the strong arguments and reasons and relies heavily on affective or emotional appeals. Imagine shopping for a detergent. You wouldn’t spend hours comparing the ingredients in each brand, would you?
Some catchy jingle, celebrity endorsement, or colorful packaging can sway your decision. These are classic examples of ‘peripheral cues.’ They enable marketers to persuade consumers without engaging them in detailed product analysis.
The Role of ELM in Audience Segmentation
With your understanding of ELM, you’re probably asking, “but how does this help in marketing?” Well, ELM plays a crucial role in audience segmentation.
This model facilitates marketers in understanding consumers better and designing profitable marketing strategies. If they know their audience leans towards the central route, they’ll focus on imparting important product information.
Conversely, for a peripheral audience, they’ll pull out their creative arsenal and use catchy taglines, celebrity endorsements, and shiny packaging.
Marketing Strategies Using ELM
Understanding the central and peripheral routes facilitates effective marketing strategies. Suppose a company is marketing a technological gadget designed for a well-informed audience. Here, the central route would be the best to highlight the product’s superior aspects – the processing power, camera quality, software capabilities, etc.
On the other hand, if the audience is not tech-savvy, then the peripheral route would work better. Promoting the gadget’s design, colors, or associating with a well-known figure would potentially drive sales.
ELM and Long-Term Consumer Behavior
ELM serves as an excellent tool for predicting and shaping long-term consumer behavior. When consumers are persuaded through the central route, they are likely to develop a stronger brand preference, leading to long-term loyalty. However, persuasion through the peripheral route can often lead to temporary or impulse purchases.
Photo by mcsheffrey on Unsplash
Factors Influencing ELM
The Factors Influencing Effectiveness of the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)
Let’s now delve into the factors that influence the effectiveness of ELM. These factors are critical in determining how our message will be processed and can significantly impact the final outcomes.
Motivation to Process the Message
The audience’s motivation to process your message greatly affects the route they take – whether more thoughtful (central route) or more superficial (peripheral route).
For example, if consumers are motivated and invested in the topic, such as buying a car or choosing a college, they are more likely to follow the central route.
On the other hand, if they are less motivated, maybe because the message is less relevant to their immediate needs, they’re likely to take the peripheral route, where they’re influenced more by superficial cues, like the attractiveness of the ad or the credibility of the spokesperson.
Ability to Process the Message
The audience’s ability to process the message also plays a key role. If they lack the necessary knowledge or cognitive skills to understand your message, they may resort to the peripheral route, rather than the central.
For example, explaining the latest tech features of a new phone to a non-tech savvy individual would likely lead to peripheral processing, as they may primarily focus on the aesthetic features or the brand’s reputation. On the contrary, a tech enthusiast would analyze these features more deeply using the central route.
Nature of the Message
Is your message complex or straightforward? The nature and intricacies of the message often dictate which route of ELM is activated. If a message is simple and requires less cognitive effort, it’s likely to be processed through the peripheral route.
Contrastingly, complex messages, requiring deeper thought from the audience, are generally processed through the central route.
Source Credibility
Lastly, the credibility of the information source significantly influences the chosen route. If the source is perceived as highly credible (an expert in the field, perhaps), the audience is more likely to use the peripheral route as they place trust in the source’s expertise.
However, if the source’s credibility is in question, they will lean towards the central route, scrutinizing the message more critically. For example, customers are more inclined to trust a skincare advertisement with a dermatologist’s endorsement, rather than one without.
Photo by elijahmacleod on Unsplash
ELM in Modern Marketing
Let’s take a shot at understanding how marketers apply the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) in today’s marketing landscape. Let’s dive in.
Motivation to Process the Message
First up, it’s crucial to trigger the motivation to process the message. You see, even the slickest marketing campaign can fall flat if your audience isn’t motivated to engage. Whether via the central or peripheral route, it’s all about making your message relatable, meaningful, and valuable.
Here’s a practical example: Coca-Cola with its “Open Happiness” campaign. Coke wasn’t just selling a beverage; it was selling happiness, a universal desire that most everyone can relate to. This connection can motivate consumers to process the ad’s message.
Ability to Process the Message
Next, ensure that the audience can process the message. This means your messaging should resonate with their knowledge level and cultural norms. If you’re marketing a new video game to teens, you’d want to use gaming lingo they understand, right?
Likewise, a campaign promoting a new makeup brand might feature social media influencers known in the cosmetics world due to consumers trust in their ability to explain the product.
Nature of the Message
Then comes the nature of your message. Remember, central messages need to be solidly argumentative and fact-based, while peripheral messages rely more on visual appeal or endorsement credibility.
Here’s a case in point: Apple’s product launches often showcase the high-tech features of their new products — a classic use of the central route.
In contrast, when Old Spice chose ex-football player Isaiah Mustafa for their ads, that’s the peripheral route in action. The message was less about the features of the body wash and more about the humor and charisma of the spokesperson.
Source Credibility
Last but not least, source credibility is a major factor in ELM. That’s because credibility can sway the audience either towards the central or peripheral route.
Take this example to heart: when Microsoft wanted to emphasize the technical specifications and productivity features of their Surface devices, they used NFL sportscaster and former Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo in their ads. Romo’s credibility as a successful professional using the device for his job effectively bolstered the message.
Photo by campaign_creators on Unsplash
Limitations and Critiques of ELM
Critiques and Limitations of ELM in Marketing
No method is perfect, ELM included. Now that we’ve covered how the Elaboration Likelihood Model works and its applications in marketing, it’s important to take a balanced approach and delve into the limitations and critiques associated with ELM.
Limitations in Measuring Motivation and Ability
ELM hinges on the expectation that the audience has both the motivation and ability to process the message. However, measuring these factors accurately can unknowingly become a challenge.
For instance, identifying a motivating factor for one segment might not equally resonate with another segment. Similarly, what we deem as ‘easy to understand’ might not necessarily ring true for all members of the audience.
Dependence on the Nature of the Message
The success of ELM is largely tied to the nature of the message. Information-overloaded messages or overly simplistic ones may deter the audience from following the central route.
On the other hand, a message deficient in peripheral cues might push the audience towards the central route when they were better suited for the peripheral one. Designing an effective message remains an art, even with the directives of ELM.
Relying on Source Credibility
A significant critique of the ELM is its inherent reliance on source credibility. For peripheral route followers especially, the persuasiveness of a message often lies in its source credibility. This implies that messages from a less credible source could be overlooked, despite their actual quality or relevance.
Ignoring Socio-Cultural Factors
ELM, in its essence, fails to consider socio-cultural norms and individual personality traits which can greatly affect the degree and direction of message-processing. For instance, certain cultures might prioritize group sentiments over individual motivation, inadvertently favoring the peripheral route.
Neglecting Emotional Factors
Lastly, the ELM largely overlooks the impact of emotional factors on the persuasion process. Let’s take a popular cola drink advertisement. The jingles, colors, and happy faces can create a positive emotional response, pushing you to purchase the drink. However, these factors are not effectively accounted for in ELM.
